The Horsham Mill street freight yard is to close for ever in November. Both Vic Track and ARTC have said that no further terminal leases will be give, allowing for the terminal to close. The then could be purchased by the Horsham Regional Council. The North Horsham residence are happy, as
according to the Wimmera Times.
"Horsham North Residents Committee has been lobbying the state and federal governments to decommission the site for 10 months.
Secretary
Rae Nelson said the committee had wanted written confirmation from both
VicTrack and the Australian Rail Track Corporation that the site would
not be used as a freight terminal after October 31.
"This is what we have been working towards and now we have it," she said.
"To have a commercial enterprise removed from a residential area will be a big relief.
"The residents in close vicinity to the terminal will be free from the noise and dust and have a bit of normalcy again."
To put some geography on the situation; housing only makes up half of Mill street behind the terminal. On the rest of the land are Fuel depots, of which BP and Mobil are still very much in operation.
The Council has a aim to remove the rail corridor altogether from Horsham. On one hand, it is requesting a return to rail passenger operations to the city, and on the other, a total removal of rail in the future. The proposed ARTC Horsham bypass, connects Dimboola with Murtoa.
The Wimmera Mail Times 18/9/2013
RELOCATION of the Melbourne-Adelaide rail corridor in Horsham could cost up to $99 million.
A
Horsham Rail Bypass Planning Report by consultants Aurecon has revealed
the project would cost about $79 million if roads bridged the bypass
route.
It
would cost about $99 million if the road crossings passed under the
bypass, which could save up to five minutes in travel time.
The
study included a new passenger railway station and estimated clean-up
work on the contaminated rail corridor would cost up to $19 million.
The
report also found a potential $20-million saving for the Western
Highway bypass if the rail bypass was completed before or at the same
time as the road bypass.
But Horsham Rural City Council chief executive Peter Brown said moving the railway could take up to 30 years.
He said the report did not recommend any bypass routes.
“Before
we could make a judgment we would really need to see where the Western
Highway bypass lands and then we should give thought on whether further
work should be done on the rail bypass,” he said.
“The selection
of the routes in the report was purely for costing purposes and there
has been no work done on where we might actually put the route.”
Council
decided to focus on improving passenger rail and the existing rail
corridor, rather than working on its relocation at a meeting on Monday
night.
The move coincided with the release of the Horsham North
Urban Design Framework, which found the rail corridor separated the
neighbourhood from the rest of Horsham.
Very sad.
ReplyDeleteHi Shelton,
DeleteWhat is more sad, is that ht e Horsham Council seems to have no interest in rail heritage, as they seem to have undisclosed plans for the land, wanting the rail corridor moved out of Horsham.
Andrew